Diffusion of Bevacizumab Across Oncology Practices: An Observational Study
Publication information:
Nancy Keating, Haiden Huskamp, Deborah Schrag, John McWilliams, Barbara McNeil, Bruce Landon, Michael Chernew, and Sharon-Lise Normand. 2018. “Diffusion of Bevacizumab Across Oncology Practices: An Observational Study”. Med Care, 56, 1, Pp. 69-77. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000840
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Technological advances can improve care and outcomes but are a primary driver of health care spending growth. Understanding diffusion and use of new oncology therapies is important, given substantial increases in prices and spending on such treatments.OBJECTIVES: Examine diffusion of bevacizumab, a novel (in 2004) and high-priced biologic cancer therapy, among US oncology practices during 2005-2012 and assess variation in use across practices.RESEARCH DESIGN: Population-based observational study.SETTING: A total of 2329 US practices providing cancer chemotherapy.PARTICIPANTS: Random 20% sample of 236,304 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged above 65 years in 2004-2012 undergoing infused chemotherapy for cancer.MEASURES: Diffusion of bevacizumab (cumulative time to first use and 10% use) in practices, variation in use across practices overall and by higher versus lower-value use. We used hierarchical models with practice random effects to estimate the between-practice variation in the probability of receiving bevacizumab and to identify factors associated with use.RESULTS: We observed relatively rapid diffusion of bevacizumab, particularly in independent practices and larger versus smaller practices. We observed substantial variation in use; the adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of bevacizumab use was 2.90 higher (2.73-3.08) for practices 1 SD above versus one standard deviation below the mean. Variation was less for higher-value [odds ratio=2.72 (2.56-2.89)] than lower-value uses [odds ratio=3.61 (3.21-4.06)].CONCLUSIONS: Use of bevacizumab varied widely across oncology practices, particularly for lower-value indications. These findings suggest that interventions targeted to practices have potential for decreasing low-value use of high-cost cancer therapies.